Cra file t4a online dating kontakt gratis Bonn
Also, the source cannot be the reporting entity, or the client; it must be independent.
As outlined at paragraph 64.2(d) of the PCMLTFR, when the dual process method is used to ascertain the identity of a client, a record must be kept that includes the person’s name, the date on which this method was used, the source of the information, the type of information referred to, and the account number included in it or a number associated with the information if no account number exists.
The requirement to report an STR to FINTRAC is identified at section 7 of the PCMLTFA, which states that “Subject to section 10.1, every person or entity referred to in section 5 shall report to the Centre, in the prescribed form and manner, every financial transaction that occurs or that is attempted in the course of their activities and in respect of which there are reasonable grounds to suspect that (a) the transaction is related to the commission or the attempted commission of a money laundering offence; or (b) the transaction is related to the commission or the attempted commission of a terrorist activity financing offence”.
Regarding the TPR obligation, subsection 7.1(1) of the PCMLTFA stipulates that “every person or entity referred to in section 5 that is required to make a disclosure under section 83.1 of the Criminal Code or under section 8 of the Regulations Implementing the United Nations Resolutions on the Suppression of Terrorism shall also make a report on it to the Centre, in the prescribed form and manner”.
It could replace the absence of a postal code, but would not in itself be an address for the purpose of the PCMLTFR.
A reporting entity must be able to demonstrate that it referred to two independent and reliable sources when using the dual process method, as per the PCMLTFR.For intelligence purposes, obtaining a precise description of an address allows FINTRAC to analyze evidence and to establish connections between a client’s physical location, financial transactions and trends that are suspected of being related to money laundering, terrorist financing or other threats to the security of Canada.This is also of great importance when disclosing intelligence to partners, which can contribute to criminal investigations by identifying new targets or hidden proceeds of crime and by disclosing facts that are necessary in obtaining warrants.Specifically, i am asking whether a proof of an account held with a foreign financial institution or proof of name and address via a foreign utility bill can be used as a document to ascertain the identity of client As explained at subsection 64(1) of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Regulations (PCMLTFR), a person’s identity can be ascertained; (a) by referring to an identification document that contains their name and photograph and that is issued by the federal government or a provincial government or by a foreign government that is not a municipal government, and by verifying that the name and photograph are those of the person; (c) by referring to information that is in their credit file — if that file is located in Canada and has been in existence for at least three years — and by verifying that the name, address and date of birth in the credit file are those of the person; (d) by doing any two of the following: (i) referring to information from a reliable source that includes their name and address, and verifying that the name and address are those of the person, (ii) referring to information from a reliable source that includes their name and date of birth, and verifying that the name and date of birth are those of the person, or (iii) referring to information that includes their name and confirms that they have a deposit account or a credit card or other loan account with a financial entity, and verifying that information.Subsection 64(1.3) of the PCMLTFR requires that “For the purposes of subparagraphs (1)(d)(i) to (iii), the information that is referred to must be from different sources, and neither the person whose identity is being ascertained nor the person or entity that is ascertaining their identity can be a source.” Additionally, subsection 64(1.4) of the PCMLTFR stipulates that “If a document is used to ascertain identity under subsection (1), it must be original, valid and current.